Now, first of all. The company I work for has a document that states that when we are on company time, or at a company sponsored event we are to represent the company in a positive and professional manner. Miss Sullivan was at a school sponsored event to the capital building. Does the Shawnee Mission School District have such a policy in place? After reviewing the SMSD website I found the policies to be vague at best. The use of electronic devices is prohibited during the school day as defined by the building administration. I found no policy in place for the use of such devices during school activities. I found this statement under the heading student conduct. The Superintendent of Schools, or his designee, is hereby authorized to promulgate and enforce reasonable guidelines, procedures and rules governing student management and conduct in the schools. Procedures and guidelines shall be established to assist all school employees in proper student management. Those procedures and guidelines are printed and distributed annually and are available in the principal's office. The Board favors all possible measures for the reform of delinquent or misbehaving students and their retention in school. However, the welfare of other students and the best interests of the School District must also be considered. Once again, very vague. And that is by design I am sure. But according to this statement it is up to the superintendent or his/her designee to enforce reasonable guidelines. Would you say that it is a reasonable guideline not to insult a sitting governor? If while I was at my company sponsored event and I made a disrespectful remark about my company or it's leadership, it could be concluded that I did not represent my company in a professional manner. I am on their time and under their rules for my conduct, so I should suffer the penalties that would be enforced for that conduct. Even if I made such a remark on a social networking site or not. Just because I type it on a site doesn't remove my responsibility for obeying the rules that are in place, free speech or not.
The topic of discussion seems to be the use of social networking. If that is the case, then it's just like me actually saying something. So if she actually spoke to the governor and said what she said, that would be wrong; but if she posts the same remark on a social networking site that's OK because of our right to free speech. This could not be further from the truth!
Now, according to the news reports she never actually told the governor anything. This entire mess is predicated on a lie! The one thing that is missing from this mess is, where are the parents? Since when is it OK for our children to insult anyone, either with the use of social networking or not! This entire thing is a terrible display of free speech. Kind of like that cult in Topeka that picket military funerals, of which I will not even speak their name. And now this student is hailed as a hero, a champion for free speech. Are you kidding me.
Listen, we do have the right as citizens of this country to say what we want, when we want. That being said, that doesn't mean we should. This student verbally insulted the sitting governor of a state, while on a school trip to the capital. I don't believe she has the right to do that. I do not like President Obama, I don't like anything he stands for. I don't like one thing he has done while in office. But it bothers me when people and especially those in the media that refer to him as Obama. The man is the President of the United States and you may not like the man, you may not like his politics, but you will respect the position that he holds. This student, or any other student should be subject to the rules that are in place; even if it is done through a social site or not. The fact is, she broke the rules; plain and simple in my view. But the district didn't have the backbone to enforce "reasonable guidelines, procedures and rules governing student management and conduct". And that is a shame.